2019 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses
14-19 July 2019
Granlibakken, Lake Tahoe
Page 200
T37: EFFECTS OF ELECTRO-ACOUSTIC STIMULATION ON HEARING IN
GUINEA PIGS WITH HYBRID COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
Melissa B. Lawrence, Irina A. Omelchenko, Wenxuan He,
Douglas Fitzpatrick, Michael E. Reiss, Lina A. J. Reiss
Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
The Electro-
Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) or “hybrid” cochlear implant (CI), combines high
-
frequency electric stimulation with residual low frequency acoustic hearing, and can be used
with a hearing aid in the same ear. Hybrid CI users have shown to benefit from this combination,
for example demonstrating greater speech comprehension in background noise in comparison
to traditional CI users. However, 30-55% of hybrid CI users lose residual acoustic hearing days
to months after implantation and activation of the CI, indicating both surgical trauma and electric
stimulation may play a role in this residual hearing loss. Through this study, we aim to identify
the mechanisms of residual acoustic hearing loss related to implantation and activation of hybrid
CIs in an animal model. Additionally, we aim to assess age as a risk factor for increased
residual hearing loss with hybrid CIs.
Two groups of guinea pigs, aged 12-21 months, were implanted with a CI in the left ear. After
four weeks of recovery, the stimulated group (n=3) received 40 hours a week of electro-acoustic
stimulation for a period of 20 weeks. The non-stimulated group (n=5) received no acoustic or
electric stimulation over the same time frame. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs),
electrically-evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs), and cochlear microphonics (CMs)
and compound action potentials (CAPs) were recorded monthly over the course of the
experiment to assess changes in acoustic thresholds, electric hearing, and neural responses.
Following the completion of the experiment, all animals were perfused and cochlear tissue was
harvested for histological evaluation to assess physiological differences between implanted and
control ears, and between stimulated and non-stimulated groups.
Cochlear implantation led to an immediate increase in ABR thresholds in both young and old
animals with thresholds peaking between 3-5 weeks after surgery and then recovering and
stabilizing. The older animals exhibited larger post-operative threshold shifts than younger
animals tested in previous studies, suggesting that older age may increase the amount of
hearing loss caused by surgical trauma. Preliminary findings also suggest that the stimulated
animals had greater delayed low frequency ABR threshold shifts compared to the non-
stimulated group. For all animals pooled together, higher EABR thresholds were positively
correlated with greater high-frequency ABR threshold shifts after surgery. Additionally, EABR
amplitude growth function slopes were negatively correlated with high frequency ABR threshold
shifts. The correlations between acoustic threshold shifts and electric stimulation measures
suggest that surgical trauma may disrupt both acoustic hearing and electric stimulation via the
neural pathway.
This work was funded by a contract with Cochlear and by NIH/NIDCD grant R56 DC016308.